ipisoft.com
https://forum.ipisoft.com/

RealSense 435 Optimal setting for body tracking
https://forum.ipisoft.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10175		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  TTrue [ Thu Aug 29, 2019 6:21 am ]
Post subject:  RealSense 435 Optimal setting for body tracking
I post a bit ago and got some answers about the Realsense profiles and how to edit.
Here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10072
I have gotten more comfortable developing in the Realsense SDK and better understand more setting.
My question is if it is possible to access all of the Realsense SDK setting thru that profile.ini document.

I know i can edit to change these setting (thanks @vmaslov)
Are these keys automatically generated from SDK or were only some added to ipi controls?
```
Depth.VisualPreset (Depth Sensor > Advanced-Mode Preset). Actually it affects the input data coming from a sensor.
Processing.Temporal.Enabled (Depth Processing > Temporal Filter > Enable)
Processing.Temporal.FilterSmoothAlpha (Depth Processing > Temporal Filter > Normalized weight of current pixel)
Processing.Temporal.FilterSmoothDelta (Depth Processing > Temporal Filter > Filter smooth delta)
Processing.Temporal.HolesFill (Depth Processing > Temporal Filter > Persistency mode)
Processing.Spatial.Enabled (Depth Processing > Spatial Filter > Enable)
Processing.Spatial.FilterMagnitude (Depth Processing > Spatial Filter > Filtering iterations)
Processing.Spatial.FilterSmoothAlpha (Depth Processing > Spatial Filter > Current pixel weight)
Processing.Spatial.FilterSmoothDelta (Depth Processing > Spatial Filter > Convolution radius)
Processing.Spatial.HolesFill (Depth Processing > Spatial Filter > Holes filling mode)
Processing.Disparity.Enabled (Depth Processing > Filter in disparity space)
```
Is it possible to access all the RealSense SDK settings that are possible in the SDK.
Example with a json like this:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/ ... reset.json

It looks like since the my initial question there is a warning about the Realsense Series 4xx in this page... http://docs.ipisoft.com/Depth_Sensors_Comparison

But I am still hopeful to use this sensor in body tracking with your software.
Any help or advice would be great.

Thanks
Author:  bluebox [ Thu Aug 29, 2019 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RealSense 435 Optimal setting for body tracking
oh ,very deep learning so very clever
Author:  vmaslov [ Fri Aug 30, 2019 2:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: RealSense 435 Optimal setting for body tracking
Yes, settings which are shown in the dialog and can be set in a profile are generated from SDK. In addition to settings for depth processing I've described earlier here's the list of names for settings accessible at "Depth Sensor" and "Color Sensor" tabs in the system dialog.
  • Depth.Exposure
  • Depth.Gain
  • Depth.EnableAutoExposure
  • Depth.EnableAutoWhiteBalance
  • Depth.VisualPreset
  • Depth.LaserPower
  • Depth.EmitterEnabled
  • Depth.InterCamSyncMode
  • Color.BacklightCompensation
  • Color.Brightness
  • Color.Contrast
  • Color.Exposure
  • Color.Gain
  • Color.Gamma
  • Color.Hue
  • Color.Saturation
  • Color.Sharpness
  • Color.WhiteBalance
  • Color.EnableAutoExposure
  • Color.EnableAutoWhiteBalance
  • Color.PowerLineFrequency
  • Color.AutoExposurePriority
However, these are not settings mentioned in JSON files for visual presets (though there may be some intersection). "Advanced" JSON settings are a black box - one can only get or set a complete JSON string via API, without any description or value range for individual settings. In the docs Intel doesn't recommend manipulating these advanced settings directly and only use JSON presets exposed via pre-defined values for "Visual Preset" setting.
iPi Recorder only allows to set "Visual Preset" setting (pre-defined JSON string) specified as "Depth.VisualPreset" in a profile but not JSON string directly.
Author:  TTrue [ Sat Aug 31, 2019 4:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: RealSense 435 Optimal setting for body tracking
Thank you for your help... Even with settings profile edited to mimic what I could from the body tracking JSON from intel... it still does not look great, very noisy depth data on R435. R415 is a bit better, but I think due to your new addition of Kinect 4 Azure my team may ditch the Realsense for Kinect. It is a shame though. The Realsense specs and footprint seemed so promising.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/