Good cam?

baby3w · **Joined:** Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:46 am **Posts:** 36

In addition to the camera EYE, what a good recommendation

I think the performance EYE outdated, there should be a better fishes

vmaslov · **Posted:** Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:27 am

Here is the excerpt from our FAQ:

Quote:

Q: Can I use high-resolution cameras to improve tracking quality?
A: No. For our software higher resolution does not give much benefit, but highly increases required data bandwidth. As this is a markerless technology, we do not need to track small markers, and 640 x 480 resolution will work as good as HD. For motion capture fps (frames per second) is much more critical parameter for tracking accuracy. Sony PS Eye camera, that allows to record at 60 fps with low distortions, is currently most recommended model.

baby3w · **Joined:** Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:46 am **Posts:** 36

Is not it more cameras 60FPS？

This was two years ago recommended

vmaslov · **Posted:** Tue Jun 11, 2013 3:44 am

What do you want to get from a newer camera model?
The note that higher resolution don't give more accuracy is still valid. PS Eye is cheap and provides very stable frame rate and good picture quality. Works seamlessly with our software. What else do you need?

baby3w · **Joined:** Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:46 am **Posts:** 36

My customers "60fps" expressed concern

FPS camera models require higher recommended

vmaslov · **Posted:** Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:56 am

OK, so you want more FPS. That's quite reasonable if you want to capture very quick motion like karate fighting or similar. For the most kinds of motions 60fps is pretty sufficient value.
Don't forget that higher FPS values again require more USB bandwidth, and more processing power to cope with the data.
Do you have any suggestions for inexpensive high FPS USB camera?

Good cam?

Who is online