here TWo 1080gtx gpu card
Attachment:
2000.jpg [ 39.34 KiB | Viewed 46302 times ]
| ipisoft.com https://forum.ipisoft.com/ |
|
| hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have ten https://forum.ipisoft.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9669 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have ten |
hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have ten |
|
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
LOVE ipi soft motion capture studio |
|
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
We have a large area for a wide range for motion capture ，but the number of support for kinect 2.0 is only four I am very sorry please to ask could we up the number |
|
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
our leaders looking forward to you will be able to increase the number of support |
|
| Author: | Snapz [ Sat Nov 26, 2016 5:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
... I don't think range of a Kinect will allow larger coverage area with added sensors, will probably cut down on volume actually. ... |
|
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Sun Nov 27, 2016 3:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
here TWo 1080gtx gpu card Attachment: 2000.jpg [ 39.34 KiB | Viewed 46302 times ] |
|
| Author: | vmaslov [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
Our calibration algorithm implies all sensors have common capture area. Thus, @Snapz is right that increasing number of Kinect sensors won't add more capture volume if you have that in mind. Besides, there is a limitation in Kinect SDK: only 1 Kinect v2 per single PC. So, you would need 10 PCs to connect 10 Kinects. There are unofficial drivers for Kinect v2 which claim to support several sensors per single PC with adequate number of USB 3.0 controllers. But they were very unreliable at the moment we tested them (about a year ago), so we decided not to use them yet. We'll check again next year. If you need large capture area, consider using PS Eye cameras with iPi Motion Capture. |
|
| Author: | hulaifeiyaolai [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
our leader want you to crease the support of the number for the actor |
|
| Author: | vmaslov [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
Increasing the maximum number of actors may be not feasible due to high probability of occlusions in the capture area. We do not plan any research in this area for the near time. |
|
| Author: | Snapz [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: hello，we need support five kinect 2.0 or more，we have te |
... If you want to check the tracking possibilities with more than 3 actors, you can try to just use single actor process and track each video by the number of actors in scene. Would work better for more isolated actors in the scene, I can not test it with Kinects, but it could be a possibility for some situations. You can then try to judge how body occlusions will affect the tracking, although you won't get the transparent (grayed out) actors as you do with 3 actor process selected, you can test the tracking with over 3 actors this way anyway. Use the 3 actor selection for first 3 actors if you want, then just switch to single actor selection for any other actors, but it would always be best to try to keep some actor separation when possible, this is true with all camera based mocap systems for best results. The way you had the Kinects set up was the best way for maximum depth of field, adding 1 more to split the front area will give 1 more view, but to try to use a circular set up will cut down on the capture volume with Kinect sensors, use the semi circle set up but don't make the outter 2 sensors face each other straight on, let them point at the angle they were shown in the previous post. This way your actors can perform further away from the sensors, as well as closer, you just have to be able to get a good calibration from the set up, which it seems you had pretty good. I believe also you would get better tracking and larger capture volume with multiple PS Eyes, but there are more requirements to be followed for best performance. ... On another note, I don't know if this would work, but maybe to be able to use more Kinects to record the same scene, it may be possible to use 2 separate Modems (different IP's) along with using a little different semi circle sensor config. where the middle sensors would overlap views a bit and using 2 Recorders with a Master/Slave for 4 sensors on each set up. Would still take 8 computers to achieve this, with a bit different sensor config., but it would in theory give a wider capture volume ability, while maintaining the better depth of field that could be walked between the 2 set ups, then in post, splice the animations back together at the appropriate points, removing the unneeded frames from the overlapped sensor tracking exported animations. You would just have to manually position the actor in studio to refit the transition frame for tracking, which isn't hard, as a T-pose is never "really" required to refit the actor pose, and you can export in a T-pose first frame on export anyway if one is needed. This wouldn't be optimal for most users, but in your case it could possibly be an alternative for additional sensor use and a bit wider volume, it's just a thought, I have no way to test it. ... |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|