Performance with 1070

LazyLeopard · **Joined:** Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:34 pm **Posts:** 7

I am currently using the trial version to track a few capture sessions. I have tried three different machines. Here are my results

Code:

+---------------------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+
| Hardware            | Algorithm | Configuration       | Params | Tracking FPS | Jitter Removal fps | Apply Motion Data   |
+---------------------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+
| CPU i7              | Old       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  0.7 fps     | 12 fps             | Very fast / instant |
| CPU i7              | Old       | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  0.4 fps     | 12 fps             |                     |
| GPU Nvidia 640      | New       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  1.1 fps     | 14 fps             | Very fast / instant |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | New       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  4.6 fps     | 4 fps              | ~35 fps             |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | New       | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  2.6 fps     | 4 fps              | ~35 fps             |
+---------------------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+

LazyLeopard · **Joined:** Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:34 pm **Posts:** 7

O.K. I realize that I had made some mistakes. These are the corrected numbers

Code:

+---------------------+----------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+
| Hardware            | iPi Ver. | Algorithm | Configuration       | Params | Tracking FPS | Jitter Removal fps | Apply Motion Data   |
+---------------------+----------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+
| CPU i7-3770K        | 3.6.6    | Old       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  0.7 fps     | 12 fps             | Very Fast / Instant |
| CPU i7-3770K        | 3.6.6    | Old       | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  0.4 fps     | 12 fps             | Very Fast / Instant |
| GPU Nvidia 640      | 3.6.6    | New       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  1.1 fps     | 14 fps             | Very Fast / Instant |
| GPU Nvidia 640      | 3.6.6    | New       | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  0.6 fps     | 14 fps             | Very Fast / Instant |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | 3.2.2    |           | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  4.6 fps     | 4 fps              | ~35 fps             |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | 3.2.2    |           | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  2.6 fps     | 4 fps              | ~35 fps             |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | 3.6.6    | New       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  9.0 fps     | >30 fps            | Very Fast / Instant |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | 3.6.6    | Old       | 2 Kinect, 3 PS move |        |  5.5 fps     | >30 fps            | Very Fast / Instant |
| GPU Nvidia 1070 GTX | 3.6.6    | New       | 2 Kinect            | +Head  |  5.1 fps     | >30 fps            | Very Fast / Instant |
+---------------------+----------+-----------+---------------------+--------+--------------+--------------------+---------------------+

As you can see that I didn't realize that I was using an older version of the software with the 1070. Now With the new version performance is much better.

My concern is why my numbers aren't as high as mentioned here. Can you share more about the hardware configuration used to achieve those numbers?

vmaslov · **Posted:** Thu Apr 12, 2018 9:04 am

Actually your value of 9.0 fps for GTX 1070/new algorithm/no head is close to 10.7 fps in the table (for High-res column). Note also that values in the table were obtained with shoulders tracking set to "calculated from arm position".
Did you track with high or low resolution setting?
What are other tracking options not mentioned in your table?
Do new/old algorithms in your table correspond to unchecked/checked advanced tracking settings > use old tracking algorithm? Or maybe you also used use fast tracking algorithm (BETA) in some tests?

LazyLeopard · **Joined:** Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:34 pm **Posts:** 7

Well its not easy to mention all parameters. So if a parameter is not mentioned its in the default state i.e. as the first time you open the software. So in all these tests shoulders are calculated from arm position and the fast (BETA) algorithm wasnt used, Resolution is set to Hi.

Although, it is a good idea to try the fast (BETA) algorithm and low resolutions and gage any differentials in quality.

Performance with 1070

Who is online