The software was a great concept. Good execution using xna framework. But maybe instead of trying to ensure that the product was secured by mancon licensing, spend some more time on the actual functionality of the software? Here are my gripes:

1. Price, I wouldn't complain had the trial software actually successfully export a working animation, the application crashed before I had an opportunity to. Is that what I wouldve have gotten for $250? I think not. As far as I'm concerned, this should be open source. "YOUR CRAZY!" you say, I don't think so, closer inspection of the software reveals the simplicity of the concept, although kudos for making "low-budget" attempt at markerless motion capture. If this doesn't work, i'll have to resort to developing my own software....or shelling out a ton of money for a higher end product.

2. Function, it doesnt work, what can I say?.....For the features I could use, updating the preview for adjusting the 3d model should be faster, it takes seconds before I see the preview when I move the slider, and sometimes I have to click play before that even happens....

Maybe I'm picky, but I wouldnt shelled out the money for the product had it worked. I guess you guys lose a customer, and plenty more when they find out the software you're offering doesn't even work...

Judging from your comments, I see that you did not even bother to download and try our product, otherwise you'd be complaining about video capture or motion tracking problems, not about export.

This is a free market and you are free to use any other products if you don't like ours.

software was downloaded. i had high hopes for it, ran through it the first few times with a ton of problems. I wouldn't just bag on the software cuz i had nothing better to do? i installed it on 3 comps before ipi studio finally ran. you guys are using the xna framework, ever think about multithreading the analysis process? most cpus are multicore now, think about it.